· Not an official government website

BatasKo

Ang Batas, Sa Simpleng Salita — your rights, finally explained.

Republic Act No. 10175· Enacted 2012-09-12

Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (RA 10175) Philippines — BatasKo ELI5

Ano ang Cybercrime Prevention Act? Alamin kung anong online acts ang ilegal sa Pilipinas, ano ang penalties, at paano ka protektado — in plain Filipino English.

ELI5OtherOFW Relevantcybercrimeonline libeldigital rights

Official text — Republic Act No. 10175

Jump to section ↓32 sections

Preamble

Fifteenth Congress

Second Regular Session

Begun and held in Metro Manila, on Monday, the twenty-fifth day of July, two thousand eleven.

REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10175

AN ACT DEFINING CYBERCRIME, PROVIDING FOR THE PREVENTION, INVESTIGATION, SUPPRESSION AND THE IMPOSITION OF PENALTIES THEREFOR AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Philippines in Congress assembled:

CHAPTER I

PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS

Section 1

Section 1.

Title.

— This Act shall be known as the

"Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012″.

Section 2

Section 2.

Declaration of Policy.

— The State recognizes the vital role of information and communications industries such as content production, telecommunications, broadcasting electronic commerce, and data processing, in the nation’s overall social and economic development. The State also recognizes the importance of providing an environment conducive to the development, acceleration, and rational application and exploitation of information and communications technology (ICT) to attain free, easy, and intelligible access to exchange and/or delivery of information; and the need to protect and safeguard the integrity of computer, computer and communications systems, networks, and databases, and the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information and data stored therein, from all forms of misuse, abuse, and illegal access by making punishable under the law such conduct or conducts. In this light, the State shall adopt sufficient powers to effectively prevent and combat such offenses by facilitating their detection, investigation, and prosecution at both the domestic and international levels, and by providing arrangements for fast and reliable international cooperation.

Section 3 — Definition of Terms.

Section 3.

Definition of Terms.

— For purposes of this Act, the following terms are hereby defined as follows:

(a)

Access

refers to the instruction, communication with, storing data in, retrieving data from, or otherwise making use of any resources of a computer system or communication network.

(b)

Alteration

refers to the modification or change, in form or substance, of an existing computer data or program.

(c)

Communication

refers to the transmission of information through ICT media, including voice, video and other forms of data.

(d)

Computer

refers to an electronic, magnetic, optical, electrochemical, or other data processing or communications device, or grouping of such devices, capable of performing logical, arithmetic, routing, or storage functions and which includes any storage facility or equipment or communications facility or equipment directly related to or operating in conjunction with such device. It covers any type of computer device including devices with data processing capabilities like mobile phones, smart phones, computer networks and other devices connected to the internet.

(e)

Computer data

refers to any representation of facts, information, or concepts in a form suitable for processing in a computer system including a program suitable to cause a computer system to perform a function and includes electronic documents and/or electronic data messages whether stored in local computer systems or online.

(f)

Computer program

refers to a set of instructions executed by the computer to achieve intended results.

(g)

Computer system

refers to any device or group of interconnected or related devices, one or more of which, pursuant to a program, performs automated processing of data. It covers any type of device with data processing capabilities including, but not limited to, computers and mobile phones. The device consisting of hardware and software may include input, output and storage components which may stand alone or be connected in a network or other similar devices. It also includes computer data storage devices or media.

(h)

Without right

refers to either: (i) conduct undertaken without or in excess of authority; or (ii) conduct not covered by established legal defenses, excuses, court orders, justifications, or relevant principles under the law.

(i)

Cyber

refers to a computer or a computer network, the electronic medium in which online communication takes place.

(j)

Critical infrastructure

refers to the computer systems, and/or networks, whether physical or virtual, and/or the computer programs, computer data and/or traffic data so vital to this country that the incapacity or destruction of or interference with such system and assets would have a debilitating impact on security, national or economic security, national public health and safety, or any combination of those matters.

(k)

Cybersecurity

refers to the collection of tools, policies, risk management approaches, actions, training, best practices, assurance and technologies that can be used to protect the cyber environment and organization and user’s assets.

(l)

Database

refers to a representation of information, knowledge, facts, concepts, or instructions which are being prepared, processed or stored or have been prepared, processed or stored in a formalized manner and which are intended for use in a computer system.

(m)

Interception

refers to listening to, recording, monitoring or surveillance of the content of communications, including procuring of the content of data, either directly, through access and use of a computer system or indirectly, through the use of electronic eavesdropping or tapping devices, at the same time that the communication is occurring.

(n)

Service provider

refers to:

(1) Any public or private entity that provides to users of its service the ability to communicate by means of a computer system; and

(2) Any other entity that processes or stores computer data on behalf of such communication service or users of such service.

(o)

Subscriber’s information

refers to any information contained in the form of computer data or any other form that is held by a service provider, relating to subscribers of its services other than traffic or content data and by which identity can be established:

(1) The type of communication service used, the technical provisions taken thereto and the period of service;

(2) The subscriber’s identity, postal or geographic address, telephone and other access numbers, any assigned network address, billing and payment information, available on the basis of the service agreement or arrangement; and

(3) Any other available information on the site of the installation of communication equipment, available on the basis of the service agreement or arrangement.

(p)

Traffic data

or non-content data refers to any computer data other than the content of the communication including, but not limited to, the communication’s origin, destination, route, time, date, size, duration, or type of underlying service.

CHAPTER II

PUNISHABLE ACTS

Section 4 — Cybercrime Offenses.

Section 4.

Cybercrime Offenses.

— The following acts constitute the offense of cybercrime punishable under this Act:

(a) Offenses against the confidentiality, integrity and availability of computer data and systems:

(1) Illegal Access. – The access to the whole or any part of a computer system without right.

(2) Illegal Interception. – The interception made by technical means without right of any non-public transmission of computer data to, from, or within a computer system including electromagnetic emissions from a computer system carrying such computer data.

(3) Data Interference. — The intentional or reckless alteration, damaging, deletion or deterioration of computer data, electronic document, or electronic data message, without right, including the introduction or transmission of viruses.

(4) System Interference. — The intentional alteration or reckless hindering or interference with the functioning of a computer or computer network by inputting, transmitting, damaging, deleting, deteriorating, altering or suppressing computer data or program, electronic document, or electronic data message, without right or authority, including the introduction or transmission of viruses.

(5) Misuse of Devices.

(i) The use, production, sale, procurement, importation, distribution, or otherwise making available, without right, of:

(aa) A device, including a computer program, designed or adapted primarily for the purpose of committing any of the offenses under this Act; or

(bb) A computer password, access code, or similar data by which the whole or any part of a computer system is capable of being accessed with intent that it be used for the purpose of committing any of the offenses under this Act.

(ii) The possession of an item referred to in paragraphs 5(i)(aa) or (bb) above with intent to use said devices for the purpose of committing any of the offenses under this section.

(6) Cyber-squatting. – The acquisition of a domain name over the internet in bad faith to profit, mislead, destroy reputation, and deprive others from registering the same, if such a domain name is:

(i) Similar, identical, or confusingly similar to an existing trademark registered with the appropriate government agency at the time of the domain name registration:

(ii) Identical or in any way similar with the name of a person other than the registrant, in case of a personal name; and

(iii) Acquired without right or with intellectual property interests in it.

(b) Computer-related Offenses:

(1) Computer-related Forgery. —

(i) The input, alteration, or deletion of any computer data without right resulting in inauthentic data with the intent that it be considered or acted upon for legal purposes as if it were authentic, regardless whether or not the data is directly readable and intelligible; or

(ii) The act of knowingly using computer data which is the product of computer-related forgery as defined herein, for the purpose of perpetuating a fraudulent or dishonest design.

(2) Computer-related Fraud. — The unauthorized input, alteration, or deletion of computer data or program or interference in the functioning of a computer system, causing damage thereby with fraudulent intent:

Provided,

That if no

damage has yet been caused, the penalty imposable shall be one (1) degree lower.

(3) Computer-related Identity Theft. – The intentional acquisition, use, misuse, transfer, possession, alteration or deletion of identifying information belonging to another, whether natural or juridical, without right:

Provided,

That if no damage has yet been caused, the penalty imposable shall be one (1) degree lower.

(c) Content-related Offenses:

(1) Cybersex. — The willful engagement, maintenance, control, or operation, directly or indirectly, of any lascivious exhibition of sexual organs or sexual activity, with the aid of a computer system, for favor or consideration.

(2) Child Pornography. — The unlawful or prohibited acts defined and punishable by

Republic Act No. 9775

or the Anti-Child Pornography Act of 2009, committed through a computer system: Provided, That the penalty to be imposed shall be (1) one degree higher than that provided for in Republic Act No. 9775.

1âwphi1

(3) Unsolicited Commercial Communications. — The transmission of commercial electronic communication with the use of computer system which seek to advertise, sell, or offer for sale products and services are prohibited unless:

(i) There is prior affirmative consent from the recipient; or

(ii) The primary intent of the communication is for service and/or administrative announcements from the sender to its existing users, subscribers or customers; or

(iii) The following conditions are present:

(aa) The commercial electronic communication contains a simple, valid, and reliable way for the recipient to reject. receipt of further commercial electronic messages (opt-out) from the same source;

(bb) The commercial electronic communication does not purposely disguise the source of the electronic message; and

(cc) The commercial electronic communication does not purposely include misleading information in any part of the message in order to induce the recipients to read the message.

(4) Libel. — The unlawful or prohibited acts of libel as defined in Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended, committed through a computer system or any other similar means which may be devised in the future.

Section 5 — Other Offenses.

Section 5.

Other Offenses.

— The following acts shall also constitute an offense:

(a) Aiding or Abetting in the Commission of Cybercrime. – Any person who willfully abets or aids in the commission of any of the offenses enumerated in this Act shall be held liable.

(b) Attempt in the Commission of Cybercrime. — Any person who willfully attempts to commit any of the offenses enumerated in this Act shall be held liable.

Section 6 — All crimes defined and penalized by the Revised Penal Code, as amended, and sp

Section 6.

All crimes defined and penalized by the Revised Penal Code, as amended, and special laws, if committed by, through and with the use of information and communications technologies shall be covered by the relevant provisions of this Act:

Provided,

That the penalty to be imposed shall be one (1) degree higher than that provided for by the Revised Penal Code, as amended, and special laws, as the case may be.

Show 25 more sections +
Section 7 — Liability under Other Laws.

Section 7.

Liability under Other Laws.

— A prosecution under this Act shall be without prejudice to any liability for violation of any provision of the Revised Penal Code, as amended, or special laws.

CHAPTER III

PENALTIES

Section 8 — Penalties.

Section 8.

Penalties.

— Any person found guilty of any of the punishable acts enumerated in Sections 4(a) and 4(b) of this Act shall be punished with imprisonment of

prision mayor

or a fine of at least Two hundred thousand pesos (PhP200,000.00) up to a maximum amount commensurate to the damage incurred or both.

Any person found guilty of the punishable act under Section 4(a)(5) shall be punished with imprisonment of prision mayor or a fine of not more than Five hundred thousand pesos (PhP500,000.00) or both.

If punishable acts in Section 4(a) are committed against critical infrastructure, the penalty of

reclusion temporal

or a fine of at least Five hundred thousand pesos (PhP500,000.00) up to maximum amount commensurate to the damage incurred or both, shall be imposed.

Any person found guilty of any of the punishable acts enumerated in Section 4(c)(1) of this Act shall be punished with imprisonment of

prision mayor

or a fine of at least Two hundred thousand pesos (PhP200,000.00) but not exceeding One million pesos (PhPl,000,000.00) or both.

Any person found guilty of any of the punishable acts enumerated in Section 4(c)(2) of this Act shall be punished with the penalties as enumerated in Republic Act No. 9775 or the "Anti-Child Pornography Act of 2009″:

Provided,

That the penalty to be imposed shall be one (1) degree higher than that provided for in Republic Act No. 9775, if committed through a computer system.

Any person found guilty of any of the punishable acts enumerated in Section 4(c)(3) shall be punished with imprisonment of

arresto mayor

or a fine of at least Fifty thousand pesos (PhP50,000.00) but not exceeding Two hundred fifty thousand pesos (PhP250,000.00) or both.

Any person found guilty of any of the punishable acts enumerated in Section 5 shall be punished with imprisonment one (1) degree lower than that of the prescribed penalty for the offense or a fine of at least One hundred thousand pesos (PhPl00,000.00) but not exceeding Five hundred thousand pesos (PhP500,000.00) or both.

Section 9 — Corporate Liability.

Section 9.

Corporate Liability.

— When any of the punishable acts herein defined are knowingly committed on behalf of or for the benefit of a juridical person, by a natural person acting either individually or as part of an organ of the juridical person, who has a leading position within, based on: (a) a power of representation of the juridical person provided the act committed falls within the scope of such authority; (b) an authority to take decisions on behalf of the juridical person:

Provided,

That the act committed falls within the scope of such authority; or (c) an authority to exercise control within the juridical person, the juridical person shall be held liable for a fine equivalent to at least double the fines imposable in Section 7 up to a maximum of Ten million pesos (PhP10,000,000.00).

If the commission of any of the punishable acts herein defined was made possible due to the lack of supervision or control by a natural person referred to and described in the preceding paragraph, for the benefit of that juridical person by a natural person acting under its authority, the juridical person shall be held liable for a fine equivalent to at least double the fines imposable in Section 7 up to a maximum of Five million pesos (PhP5,000,000.00).

The liability imposed on the juridical person shall be without prejudice to the criminal liability of the natural person who has committed the offense.

CHAPTER IV

ENFORCEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION

Section 10 — Law Enforcement Authorities.

Section 10.

Law Enforcement Authorities.

— The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) and the Philippine National Police (PNP) shall be responsible for the efficient and effective law enforcement of the provisions of this Act. The NBI and the PNP shall organize a cybercrime unit or center manned by special investigators to exclusively handle cases involving violations of this Act.

Section 11 — Duties of Law Enforcement Authorities.

Section 11.

Duties of Law Enforcement Authorities.

— To ensure that the technical nature of cybercrime and its prevention is given focus and considering the procedures involved for international cooperation, law enforcement authorities specifically the computer or technology crime divisions or units responsible for the investigation of cybercrimes are required to submit timely and regular reports including pre-operation, post-operation and investigation results and such other documents as may be required to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for review and monitoring.

Section 12 — Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data.

Section 12.

Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data.

— Law enforcement authorities, with due cause, shall be authorized to collect or record by technical or electronic means traffic data in real-time associated with specified communications transmitted by means of a computer system.

Traffic data refer only to the communication’s origin, destination, route, time, date, size, duration, or type of underlying service, but not content, nor identities.

All other data to be collected or seized or disclosed will require a court warrant.

Service providers are required to cooperate and assist law enforcement authorities in the collection or recording of the above-stated information.

The court warrant required under this section shall only be issued or granted upon written application and the examination under oath or affirmation of the applicant and the witnesses he may produce and the showing: (1) that there are reasonable grounds to believe that any of the crimes enumerated hereinabove has been committed, or is being committed, or is about to be committed: (2) that there are reasonable grounds to believe that evidence that will be obtained is essential to the conviction of any person for, or to the solution of, or to the prevention of, any such crimes; and (3) that there are no other means readily available for obtaining such evidence.

Section 13 — Preservation of Computer Data.

Section 13.

Preservation of Computer Data.

— The integrity of traffic data and subscriber information relating to communication services provided by a service provider shall be preserved for a minimum period of six (6) months from the date of the transaction. Content data shall be similarly preserved for six (6) months from the date of receipt of the order from law enforcement authorities requiring its preservation.

Law enforcement authorities may order a one-time extension for another six (6) months:

Provided,

That once computer data preserved, transmitted or stored by a service provider is used as evidence in a case, the mere furnishing to such service provider of the transmittal document to the Office of the Prosecutor shall be deemed a notification to preserve the computer data until the termination of the case.

The service provider ordered to preserve computer data shall keep confidential the order and its compliance.

Section 14 — Disclosure of Computer Data.

Section 14.

Disclosure of Computer Data.

— Law enforcement authorities, upon securing a court warrant, shall issue an order requiring any person or service provider to disclose or submit subscriber’s information, traffic data or relevant data in his/its possession or control within seventy-two (72) hours from receipt of the order in relation to a valid complaint officially docketed and assigned for investigation and the disclosure is necessary and relevant for the purpose of investigation.

Section 15 — Search, Seizure and Examination of Computer Data.

Section 15.

Search, Seizure and Examination of Computer Data.

— Where a search and seizure warrant is properly issued, the law enforcement authorities shall likewise have the following powers and duties.

Within the time period specified in the warrant, to conduct interception, as defined in this Act, and:

(a) To secure a computer system or a computer data storage medium;

(b) To make and retain a copy of those computer data secured;

(c) To maintain the integrity of the relevant stored computer data;

(d) To conduct forensic analysis or examination of the computer data storage medium; and

(e) To render inaccessible or remove those computer data in the accessed computer or computer and communications network.

Pursuant thereof, the law enforcement authorities may order any person who has knowledge about the functioning of the computer system and the measures to protect and preserve the computer data therein to provide, as is reasonable, the necessary information, to enable the undertaking of the search, seizure and examination.

Law enforcement authorities may request for an extension of time to complete the examination of the computer data storage medium and to make a return thereon but in no case for a period longer than thirty (30) days from date of approval by the court.

Section 16 — Custody of Computer Data.

Section 16.

Custody of Computer Data.

— All computer data, including content and traffic data, examined under a proper warrant shall, within forty-eight (48) hours after the expiration of the period fixed therein, be deposited with the court in a sealed package, and shall be accompanied by an affidavit of the law enforcement authority executing it stating the dates and times covered by the examination, and the law enforcement authority who may access the deposit, among other relevant data. The law enforcement authority shall also certify that no duplicates or copies of the whole or any part thereof have been made, or if made, that all such duplicates or copies are included in the package deposited with the court. The package so deposited shall not be opened, or the recordings replayed, or used in evidence, or then contents revealed, except upon order of the court, which shall not be granted except upon motion, with due notice and opportunity to be heard to the person or persons whose conversation or communications have been recorded.

Section 17 — Destruction of Computer Data.

Section 17.

Destruction of Computer Data.

— Upon expiration of the periods as provided in Sections 13 and 15, service providers and law enforcement authorities, as the case may be, shall immediately and completely destroy the computer data subject of a preservation and examination.

Section 18 — Exclusionary Rule.

Section 18.

Exclusionary Rule.

— Any evidence procured without a valid warrant or beyond the authority of the same shall be inadmissible for any proceeding before any court or tribunal.

Section 19 — Restricting or Blocking Access to Computer Data.

Section 19.

Restricting or Blocking Access to Computer Data.

— When a computer data is prima facie found to be in violation of the provisions of this Act, the DOJ shall issue an order to restrict or block access to such computer data.

Section 20 — Noncompliance.

Section 20.

Noncompliance.

— Failure to comply with the provisions of Chapter IV hereof specifically the orders from law enforcement authorities shall be punished as a violation of Presidential Decree No. 1829 with imprisonment of prision correctional in its maximum period or a fine of One hundred thousand pesos (Php100,000.00) or both, for each and every noncompliance with an order issued by law enforcement authorities.

CHAPTER V

JURISDICTION

Section 21 — Jurisdiction.

Section 21.

Jurisdiction.

— The Regional Trial Court shall have jurisdiction over any violation of the provisions of this Act. including any violation committed by a Filipino national regardless of the place of commission. Jurisdiction shall lie if any of the elements was committed within the Philippines or committed with the use of any computer system wholly or partly situated in the country, or when by such commission any damage is caused to a natural or juridical person who, at the time the offense was committed, was in the Philippines.

There shall be designated special cybercrime courts manned by specially trained judges to handle cybercrime cases.

CHAPTER VI

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION

Section 22 — General Principles Relating to International Cooperation.

Section 22.

General Principles Relating to International Cooperation.

— All relevant international instruments on international cooperation in criminal matters, arrangements agreed on the basis of uniform or reciprocal legislation, and domestic laws, to the widest extent possible for the purposes of investigations or proceedings concerning criminal offenses related to computer systems and data, or for the collection of evidence in electronic form of a criminal, offense shall be given full force and effect.

CHAPTER VII

COMPETENT AUTHORITIES

Section 23 — Department of Justice (DOJ).

Section 23.

Department of Justice (DOJ).

— There is hereby created an Office of Cybercrime within the DOJ designated as the central authority in all matters related to international mutual assistance and extradition.

Section 24 — Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center.

Section 24.

Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center.

— There is hereby created, within thirty (30) days from the effectivity of this Act, an inter-agency body to be known as the Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center (CICC), under the administrative supervision of the Office of the President, for policy coordination among concerned agencies and for the formulation and enforcement of the national cybersecurity plan.

Section 25 — Composition.

Section 25.

Composition.

— The CICC shall be headed by the Executive Director of the Information and Communications Technology Office under the Department of Science and Technology (ICTO-DOST) as Chairperson with the Director of the NBI as Vice Chairperson; the Chief of the PNP; Head of the DOJ Office of Cybercrime; and one (1) representative from the private sector and academe, as members. The CICC shall be manned by a secretariat of selected existing personnel and representatives from the different participating agencies.

1âwphi1

Section 26 — Powers and Functions.

Section 26.

Powers and Functions.

— The CICC shall have the following powers and functions:

(a) To formulate a national cybersecurity plan and extend immediate assistance for the suppression of real-time commission of cybercrime offenses through a computer emergency response team (CERT);

(b) To coordinate the preparation of appropriate and effective measures to prevent and suppress cybercrime activities as provided for in this Act;

(c) To monitor cybercrime cases being bandied by participating law enforcement and prosecution agencies;

(d) To facilitate international cooperation on intelligence, investigations, training and capacity building related to cybercrime prevention, suppression and prosecution;

(e) To coordinate the support and participation of the business sector, local government units and nongovernment organizations in cybercrime prevention programs and other related projects;

(f) To recommend the enactment of appropriate laws, issuances, measures and policies;

(g) To call upon any government agency to render assistance in the accomplishment of the CICC’s mandated tasks and functions; and

(h) To perform all other matters related to cybercrime prevention and suppression, including capacity building and such other functions and duties as may be necessary for the proper implementation of this Act.

CHAPTER VIII

FINAL PROVISIONS

Section 27 — Appropriations.

Section 27.

Appropriations.

— The amount of Fifty million pesos (PhP50,000,000_00) shall be appropriated annually for the implementation of this Act.

Section 28 — Implementing Rules and Regulations.

Section 28.

Implementing Rules and Regulations.

— The ICTO-DOST, the DOJ and the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) shall jointly formulate the necessary rules and regulations within ninety (90) days from approval of this Act, for its effective implementation.

Section 29 — Separability Clause

Section 29.

Separability Clause

— If any provision of this Act is held invalid, the other provisions not affected shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 30 — Repealing Clause.

Section 30.

Repealing Clause.

— All laws, decrees or rules inconsistent with this Act are hereby repealed or modified accordingly. Section 33(a) of Republic Act No. 8792 or the "Electronic Commerce Act" is hereby modified accordingly.

Section 31 — Effectivity.

Section 31.

Effectivity.

— This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after the completion of its publication in the Official Gazette or in at least two (2) newspapers of general circulation.

Approved,

(Sgd.)

FELICIANO BELMONTE JR.

Speaker of the House of Representatives

(Sgd.)

JUAN PONCE ENRILE

President of the Senate

This Act which is a consolidation of Senate Bill No. 2796 and House Bill No. 5808 was finally passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on June 5, 2012 and June 4, 2012, respectively.

(Sgd.)

MARILYN B. BARUA-YAP

Secretary General

House of Representatives

(Sgd.)

EMMA LIRIO-REYES

Secretary of Senate

Approved: SEP 12 2012

(Sgd.) BENIGNO S. AQUINO III

President of the Philippines

The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation

Full text on BatasKo. Original source: Official Gazette / Lawphil.

Ano Ba Talaga Ito? (ELI5 Summary)

The Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10175) is the Philippine law that says certain things you do online — hacking, spreading viruses, identity theft, scamming, and yes, even posting defamatory content — are crimes with real jail time and fines. It also gives the government power to investigate these acts and work with other countries to catch cybercriminals. In short: the rules you follow sa totoong buhay apply online din.


What the Law Actually Says

RA 10175 was signed into law on September 12, 2012. It groups cybercrime into three big buckets.

Bucket 1: Attacks on computer systems (Section 4[a])

This covers the "classic hacker" stuff:

  • Illegal Access — logging into someone else's system or account without permission
  • Illegal Interception — secretly listening to or recording someone's online communications
  • Data Interference — deleting, corrupting, or introducing viruses into someone's data
  • System Interference — deliberately crashing or slowing down a computer or network
  • Misuse of Devices — selling or using hacking tools, passwords, or access codes without right
  • Cyber-squatting — registering a domain name in bad faith to profit from someone else's brand or name

Bucket 2: Computer-related crimes (Section 4[b])

These are familiar crimes, pero ginawa sa internet:

  • Computer-related Forgery — creating fake digital documents
  • Computer-related Fraud — scamming someone through a computer or online platform
  • Computer-related Identity Theft — stealing and using someone's online identity without consent

Bucket 3: Content-related offenses (Section 4[c])

This is where it gets personal for most Filipinos:

  • Cybersex — operating or knowingly accessing a live sex show online for profit
  • Child Pornography — producing, distributing, or possessing CSAM online (covered also by RA 9775)
  • Unsolicited Commercial Communications — mass-sending spam with harmful or deceptive content
  • Online Libel — this is Section 4(c)(4), the most controversial part

Under Section 4(c)(4), online libel is essentially the same as libel under the Revised Penal Code, but committed "through a computer system or other similar means." The Supreme Court upheld this provision in Disini v. Secretary of Justice (G.R. No. 203335, 2014).

Penalties (Section 8)

Most cybercrime offenses carry penalties one degree higher than their equivalent offline crime. Online libel, for example, carries a penalty of prision correccional in its minimum period — that's 6 months and 1 day to 6 years imprisonment — plus fines up to ₱1,000,000.

Hacking and system interference involving critical infrastructure (power grids, banking systems, government networks) can mean up to life imprisonment.


What This Means for You / Ano ang Ibig Sabihin Nito

Ang screenshot mo ay ebidensya. Posts, messages, emails — lahat pwedeng gamitin as digital evidence in cybercrime cases.

If someone hacks your GCash, e-wallet, or social media account, that person committed a crime under RA 10175. Hindi lang "bad manners" — federal-level crime yan.

That Facebook post calling your boss or ex a criminal? If it's false and damages their reputation, that could be online libel — and the penalties are heavier than regular libel sa korte. The law considers each "like" or "share" potentially a separate offense, though the Supreme Court has limited this interpretation.

The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) Cybercrime Division and the Philippine National Police Anti-Cybercrime Group (PNP-ACG) are the two main agencies who investigate these cases.


Who This Law Affects / Sino Ang Apektado

  • Social media users — anyone who posts, shares, or comments publicly online
  • Online sellers and buyers — victims and perpetrators of e-commerce fraud
  • Business owners — companies whose systems can be hacked or whose brands can be cyber-squatted
  • Content creators and bloggers — at risk for online libel complaints
  • Children and parents — minors are both potential victims (CSAM, cyberbullying) and potential offenders
  • IT professionals — possessing certain hacking tools can itself be a crime under Section 4(a)(6)
  • OFWs — see dedicated section below

What Most Filipinos Get Wrong

❌ "Hindi ako ma-charge sa online libel — I just shared the post, hindi ako nag-post."

Sharing defamatory content you know to be false can still expose you to liability. The Supreme Court in Disini said original authors are primarily liable, but be careful — the law's scope on republication is still being tested in courts.

❌ "Pag hacked ang account ko, wala naman akong magagawa."

May gagawin ka. You can file a complaint directly with the NBI Cybercrime Division (nbi.gov.ph) or the PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group (acg.pnp.gov.ph). Document everything: screenshots, timestamps, transaction records.

❌ "Online libel at regular libel pareho lang."

Hindi. Online libel carries a higher penalty — one degree above regular libel. At ang prescriptive period (deadline to file charges) is 15 years for online libel, versus 1 year for regular libel. That means someone can file charges against you more than a decade after the post.

❌ "Private messages are safe — hindi siya public."

Illegal interception (Section 4[a][2]) covers non-public transmissions too. Recording someone's private chats or calls without consent is also a cybercrime.


Para sa OFWs / For OFWs

Kung naka-abroad ka, RA 10175 still applies to you in important ways — bilang biktima at bilang potensyal na respondent.

Bilang biktima:

OFW scams are rampant — fake job recruiters online, romance scams targeting families back home, GCash phishing. These are computer-related fraud under Section 4(b)(2). Your family in the Philippines can file a complaint with the NBI or PNP-ACG on your behalf.

OWWA and the Philippine Overseas Labor Office (POLO) can also coordinate with the DOJ Office of Cybercrime for cases involving OFW victims.

Bilang may sariling account at posts:

If you're posting from Saudi Arabia, Canada, o kahit saan pa — Filipino courts can still have jurisdiction over you if the content was accessed or the harm was felt in the Philippines. Under Section 21 of RA 10175, jurisdiction covers any crime committed against a Filipino citizen or with a computer system located in the Philippines, regardless of where you physically are.

Practical tip: If you receive a demand letter or summons about an online libel case while abroad, do not ignore it. Consult a Philippine lawyer immediately — hindi pwedeng balewalain kahit malayo ka.


What to Do / Kung May Nangyari Sa'Yo

If you're a victim of cybercrime:

  1. Document everything now. Screenshot with timestamps. Record transaction IDs, URLs, usernames. Don't delete anything.
  2. Secure your accounts. Change passwords, enable two-factor authentication, report compromised accounts to the platform.
  3. File a complaint with NBI Cybercrime Division at their main office (Taft Ave., Manila) or through their regional offices. Bring your printed evidence.
  4. You can also go to PNP-ACG at Camp Crame, Quezon City, or file online through their e-Complaint portal.
  5. For online banking fraud, report immediately to your bank and to the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) Financial Consumer Protection helpline at 8-708-7087.

If you're worried about a libel complaint against you:

  1. Do not delete the post immediately — it can be seen as destroying evidence, which may complicate your case.
  2. Consult a lawyer before responding to any demand letter.
  3. The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) has free legal aid clinics in most cities.

Related Laws


FAQ

Q: Puwede ba akong ma-arrest kaagad sa online libel complaint?

Hindi agad. The complainant must file a case with the prosecutor's office first. The prosecutor will conduct a preliminary investigation. Kung may probable cause, that's when a warrant of arrest can be issued. You will have a chance to submit a counter-affidavit before that happens.

Q: Sino ang may kapangyarihang mag-takedown ng content online?

Under Section 19 of RA 10175, the DOJ can issue a takedown order for content that is "prima facie" a cybercrime. However, the Supreme Court in Disini struck down this provision as unconstitutional — it violated freedom of expression because there was no prior judicial order required. As of now, takedowns generally require a court order.

Q: Ano ang prescriptive period ng online libel? Gaano katagal pwedeng mag-file ng kaso?

Online libel under RA 10175 has a prescriptive period of 12 years under the Revised Penal Code's rules for afflictive penalties, though some courts and commentators cite 15 years. This is significantly longer than the 1-year period for ordinary libel — so yes, someone can file against you years after the post.

Q: May kaso ba kung nag-screenshot lang ako ng private conversation ng ibang tao?

Depende. Kung ikaw mismo ay parte ng conversation, generally you can screenshot it for personal use. Pero kung i-share mo publicly to damage someone's reputation, you could face online libel or privacy-related charges. Kung secretly kang nag-access ng ibang tao's messages without being part of the conversation, that's potentially illegal interception under Section 4(a)(2).

Q: Libre ba ang filing ng cybercrime complaint?

Filing with the NBI or PNP-ACG is generally free. Kung mag-file ka ng criminal case through a private prosecutor, may kaukulang filing fees sa korte. Legal aid is available through the IBP, PAO (Public Attorney's Office), and various law school legal aid clinics.


Sources

  1. Republic Act No. 10175 — Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012. Official text(archived at)

  2. Disini v. Secretary of Justice, G.R. No. 203335, February 11, 2014. Supreme Court of the Philippines. (archived at)

  3. Department of Justice — Office of Cybercrime. https://cybercrime.doj.gov.ph

  4. PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group. https://acg.pnp.gov.ph

  5. NBI Cybercrime Division. https://nbi.gov.ph/cybercrime-division/

RELATED RIGHTS

Legal disclaimer: BatasKo provides general legal information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a licensed Filipino lawyer or the Public Attorney's Office (PAO).

← Browse all Republic Acts